Given the tenor of public dialogue around the presidential transition, we’re likely to see even more division and emotion emerge around the already controversial topic of charter schools. That’s where we come in.
With the announcement of Betsy DeVos as President-Elect Trump’s Secretary of Education, charter schools look to be a central issue for the next administration. DeVos is an advocate for both charter schools and voucher programs, school choice approaches that have their share of ardent supporters and critics.
Charter schools are already a controversial issue. Given the tenor of public dialogue around the presidential transition, we’re likely to see even more division and emotion emerge around the topic. Passion and advocacy have their place in social issues. But with so much noise, it can become difficult for the public – including parents and voters – to understand an issue, weigh their own values and make a judgment on where they stand.
That’s where we come in. Together with the Spencer Foundation, we developed Charter Schools In Perspective a nonpartisan, non-ideological set of resources about charter schools and their place in American education. Our goal for this project is to help communities, educators, policymakers and journalists understand different approaches to educational policies and practices and the impacts those have on all kids. The resources have been designed and tested to foster better, more civil conversations.
The resources developed for Charter Schools In Perspective include:
Charter schools made up nearly 7 percent of all U.S. public schools in 2013-14 and are quickly growing. Between 2007-08 and 2013-14, the number of charter schools increased by nearly 50 percent, and the schools are permitted in 43 states and the District of Columbia.
Debates over charter schools will continue, and both sides will make their cases, some well-founded and others not. A lot is riding on the decisions about expansion and closure – too much to not have an informed, civil dialogue.
We urge you to use the In Perspective resources and encourage open, honest dialogue at your dinner table, on your Facebook page or at a local school board meeting. Our research guide and discussion starter can help keep things in perspective and the conversation on a non-ideological, pragmatic track.
Schools, especially in rural areas, are not providing the education our children need. Most rural schools don't even make the rankings. Most were way behind in offering AP courses. They lack the population and the resources.
Ideally online courses taught by master teachers would be available (current teachers could be tutors going to visit those with problems) but then the telecommunications companies have forgotten rural areas and the costs are prohibitive to those in rural areas.
First step is to get affordable broadband to rural areas (even the current flipped classroom would work better).
Children in rural areas have less access to online resources, less access to their rural libraries and school libraries since they may be bused. And there is most likely no public transportation.
Think of the needs of rural schools. Those students leave their rural areas (brain drain) and go into the city workforce and need to be able to compete with those who had city or suburban advantages.. Rural areas are the feeders in to the work arena--people should want their nurses, technicians etc. to be well educated, no matter where they come from. Education is the key but we need to start with equal and affordable access to information, educators and the Internet.
Charter schools could be an option but need the same resources as public schools (not just per pupil funds but funding to build their infrastructure too---some sunk funds) Whether these charter schools could help rural areas is not known; the traditional charter school is most likely in a suburban or city area. Are charter schools going online? Think about rural areas. Fight for access to equal resources--GOOD teachers and affordable and reliable access to broadband and libraries.
The biggest flaw in the research done on the "success" of charter schools, public schools, or other educational programs is that they use test scores as the primary, and in some cases, only indicator. Yet there is a mountain of research showing that test scores do not measure "learning" in any meaningful way.