National Health Care Expenditures
published February 2008
Baltimore, MD 21244
Public Agenda helps communities and the nation
solve tough problems through:
Research that illuminates people's views & values;
Engagement that gets people talking, learning from each other and working together on solutions; and
Communications that spreads the word and builds momentum for change.
By doing so, we seek to contribute to a democracy in which problem-solving triumphs over gridlock and inertia, and where public policy reflects the deliberations and values of the citizenry.
Public Agenda is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. You can find out more about us in our What We Do and Frequently Asked Questions pages.
Alison Kadlec
Feb 1, 2012
This post was written for the 20 community colleges participating in Completion by Design, a five-year Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation initiative that aims to significantly increase completion rates for low-income students under 26. As a “National Assistance partner” for Completion by Design, Public Agenda provides direct assistance to the colleges to help them build capacity for solutions-oriented dialogue among faculty, staff and administration. Here, Public Agenda's Alison Kadlec discusses best practices for authentic internal stakeholder engagement. While the post is geared toward Completion by Design planning teams, the principles are useful for any authentic engagement process.
***
Allison Rizzolo
Jan 24, 2012
Far too often, throughout our work in the education field, we've seen even the most earnest and promising ideas from experts and reformers for improving schools and ramping up student learning met with confusion, anxiety or even anger from teachers, parents, students or community members.
published February 2008
2011 Public Agenda
Comments
Our nation is spending 16.6 % of GDP in 2008 and projected to be 19.5% by year 2017. No nation can afford to spend 19.5% of GDP on healthcare. To day our businesses, families and individuals can not afford current cost of healthcare. Wise man always looks at his success and failures. and always keeps open mind to learn form other countries healthcare system. We must cover each and every individuals from birth to death with out any consideration of payment. It must be based on need rather than ability to pay. We are spending 46% and 37% more per person per year than Canada and Switzerland respectively. None of the well developed industrialized countries in the world. None of them keeps its citizens uninsured or force them to declare bankruptcies for medical expense. This is national disgrace and it is not the American values.
The Lewin group, independent healthcare policy analysis and economical impact consistently reported that SINGLE PAYER UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE ( Social Insurance ) covers all residents and reduc es the total cost of healthcare.
Our politicians are not going to change our healthcare system . Only concern and well informed citizens will bring healthcare reform. for current and future generations.
Go and get information about other countries healthcare system.
Kirti sheth, MD
im sorry sir but i disagree, Social Healthcare is bad. It would equal a jump is taxes, plus if we look at England, Canada, and Switzerland, we see that hospitals are becoming overcrowded, waiting time for treatment is days, and most of the time, people with serious illnesses die before recieveing treatment. I might be wrong but my opinion is that Universal healthcare would be worse than what we have now.
I agree with you. Social Healthcare is bad news for everyone. So far, it has yet to work in any other region of the world, so why try it in the US? Not to mention, no country in the world can even afford to insure all of it's citizens, even with ridiculous tax hikes.
Post new comment