Public Agenda Issue Guide: Medical Research

Citizens

are confronted with serious issues every minute of the day. Grasping the underlying issues from the headlines is a difficult task. Give us ten minutes a day and we will help bring clarity to the chaos of the news, policy and issues.

ON THE AGENDA

Connecticut Court Rules in Favor of Same Sex Marraige

Jenny Choi
Oct 10, 2008

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled today that same-sex couples have the right to marry under that state's constitution. The eight couples who filed suit in 2004 argued that they had been unfairly denied the benefits of marriage that heterosexual couples are entitled to. Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell has said that she would not challenge the court's ruling.

Comment Read More

The Second Presidential Debate: Actually, There's a Lot Going On

Scott Bittle
Oct 9, 2008

Despite the criticism of the town hall format, in many ways the second presidential debate was more substantive than the first session, and dramatically more so than the vice presidential debate last week. (I mean the real one, not the SNL version). Political junkies often say the town hall debate just regurgitates old news, but for many voters who haven't been paying attention and are just starting to think about the candidates, that's useful information.

Comment Read More

FACING UP TO THE
Nation's Finances

National Debt Clock

ISSUE GUIDE: Medical Research

OVERVIEW

Medical Research

Over the last century, medical research has arguably advanced human health more than all the previous 5,000 years combined. One statistic puts the change into perspective: Americans born in 1900 could expect to live an average of 49 years, but those born today will live an average of 77 years.

Much of the credit for that longer, healthier life span goes to medical discoveries such as insulin, antibiotics, blood pressure medications, and advanced surgery. Scourges such as polio and measles have been virtually eliminated in the U.S., and we have vastly increased our arsenal of treatments to fight AIDS and cancer.

GET THE FACTS

View All Charts

CONSIDER THE CHOICES

Scientists should be free to pursue genetic research

Treat the sick, but dont change our genetic future

Leave humans as God and nature created them

Science thrives - and humanity benefits - when researchers are free to pursue knowledge and follow the trail of its discoveries, wherever they may lead. Prohibiting research into areas such as cloning and genetic alteration may allay the public's fears, but could also cut off progress that would benefit millions. It's immoral to block research that could improve so many lives. Besides, who gets to decide what knowledge is good and what is bad? Pursuing knowledge is a basic human freedom, and controlling knowledge is a favorite weapon of any tyrant. In reality, people will inevitably pursue new ideas, with or without government approval. Forcing such research underground or overseas is no answer. It is better for society to learn to handle new knowledge and its social implications than to try and outlaw it.
Read More

Scientists should learn how to treat diseases using stem cells and gene therapy. But they should never try to engineer the genes of future generations. Scientists can and should use new knowledge to treat individuals who have fallen ill, even by repairing an individual's genetic flaws. But letting any changes to the genetic code be passed on to future generations could have consequences that no one can even imagine. There's just no way to anticipate the kind of damage this might cause. Eliminating one genetic disease might leave our grandchildren vulnerable to another disorder, for example. Trying to make people taller, or smarter, or more beautiful could carry a similar risk. Genetic perfection is tempting, but it's just too dangerous to attempt.
Read More

Human life is sacred and should not be treated as just another laboratory in which to conduct experiments. By manipulating genes, we will be playing God and attempting to circumvent the laws of nature that govern creation. Stem cell research sounds harmless, but taking cells from human embryos is an unacceptable sacrifice of potential life to save another. For better or worse, humans are created with a set of genes that have evolved over hundreds of generations. Even our imperfections may have a purpose. If science gives us the ability to cure people who carry different genetic traits, eugenics is one short step away. Who decides what's a bad gene that must be fixed? Do we want to breed human beings like we breed cattle?
Read More