Seven in 10 Americans say they would prefer improving existing schools over providing vouchers for private or church-related schools

Public Agenda helps communities and the nation
solve tough problems through:
Research that illuminates people's views & values;
Engagement that gets people talking, learning from each other and working together on solutions; and
Communications that spreads the word and builds momentum for change.
By doing so, we seek to contribute to a democracy in which problem-solving triumphs over gridlock and inertia, and where public policy reflects the deliberations and values of the citizenry.
Public Agenda is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. You can find out more about us in our What We Do and Frequently Asked Questions pages.
Alison Kadlec
Feb 1, 2012
This post was written for the 20 community colleges participating in Completion by Design, a five-year Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation initiative that aims to significantly increase completion rates for low-income students under 26. As a “National Assistance partner” for Completion by Design, Public Agenda provides direct assistance to the colleges to help them build capacity for solutions-oriented dialogue among faculty, staff and administration. Here, Public Agenda's Alison Kadlec discusses best practices for authentic internal stakeholder engagement. While the post is geared toward Completion by Design planning teams, the principles are useful for any authentic engagement process.
***
Allison Rizzolo
Jan 24, 2012
Far too often, throughout our work in the education field, we've seen even the most earnest and promising ideas from experts and reformers for improving schools and ramping up student learning met with confusion, anxiety or even anger from teachers, parents, students or community members.

2011 Public Agenda
The fallacy of this poll question is that it assumes that the amount spent on education is a zero sum game. "Do you want to improve public schools OR pay for vouchers?" As if doing one precludes the other. The fact is that the average spending per pupil in public schools is $6800 per pupil, versus $3300 per pupil in private schools. If a parent gets a voucher to send their kid to private school, it actually SAVES $3500 for the state. That same money can then be used to spend more on the remaining public school students.
That's assuming the state fully subsidizes vouchers -- in most states, vouchers don't cover the full cost of the private school tuition. The difference would be paid by those who voluntarily put their kids in private schools, meaning the total amount spent on education increases in the state.
In other words providing vouchers INCREASES the amount that can be spent on existing schools, and furthermore increases the TOTAL amount spent on education. You can have your cake and eat it too! There's NO logical reason to oppose vouchers on economic grounds, which is the tack taken by the ridiculously biased wording of this poll question.
There are more nuanced reasons to oppose vouchers. One theory is that all the "good" students (meaning students with good PARENTS who don't want to send their kids to the public schools where drug problems are rampant, and discipline is terrible) will flee the deteriorating public schools. I don't consider that a bad thing though. If schooling changes to all private, that's fine with me. Private schools produce comparable results for fewer dollars -- how is that bad for society?
The other reason I've heard is separation of church and state (many private schools are religious). There are non-religious private schools out there, and I'm sure many more would spring up if vouchers were approved. Besides, the voucher is a benefit sent to the parent, not to the school. As such, it shouldn't be the government's business how it gets spent. When the government sends you a stimulus rebate check, it doesn't forbid you from donating it to a church, does it?
An overwhelming reason to support vouchers is that it creates freedom of choice for parents. When deciding on a policy, I think we should always err on the side of freedom, especially in cases like this where it is a "win win" scenario.
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Please find a way to get this message heard!
Post new comment