Lawmakers Propose Bailout Provision: Curbs on Executive Pay
One possible sticking point that's emerged over the Treasury's Wall Street bailout request of $700 billion is the proposal from a group of lawmakers for curbs on what top executives can earn. The alarming fact that heads of Fannie Mae, AIG and others were contractually guaranteed millions of dollars in severance pay has prompted some members of Congress to request such curbs on executive compensation in the bailout bill. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has resisted the provision.
Public attitudes are complex on the issue of executive pay. Public Agenda's focus group report on business ethics, A Few Bad Apples?, found that most people weren't actually bothered by high salaries for executives, and some said executives are entitled to their salaries if they oversee a thriving business. In fact, many attributed the reality of high executive compensation to the nature and function of the free market system, and nearly no one begrudged Bill Gates his wealth. But the public did show serious concern with business leaders who enrich themselves while driving their companies into the ground; many expressed outrage at how they could be rewarded with exorbitant salaries or bonuses during times of company struggle and employee cutbacks.









I believe Ralph Nader suggested this a while ago along with other things in his 10 point ecnomic plan.
http://www.votenader.org/media/2008/09/16/meltdown/
www.pafundi.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Number of Operations Iraq Freedom and Enduring Freedom casualties
as confirmed by U.S. Central Command: 4751
From the makers of "eminent threat of destruction by Iraqi WMD" and the consequential misadventure in Iraq to the tune of tens of billions of dollars, we appear to be spoon fed another potential misadventure to the tune of $700 Billion wall street bailout. Is the economic threat as dire for average american citizens as is being told? Or just so much Nigerian "yellow cake" bluster? Once bitten twice shy. Is the administration stringing us along with economic "fear tactics", ensuring the wealthy class, headed by wall street power brokers, are padded from the result of driving the economy into the ground? I say let the market place work its magic, a bank fails, billions are lost, a new bank will rise with more prudent practices. Bail them out, and we'll likely repeat this crisis again.
All lawmakers who vote for the Bailout should be run out of office. Why did they only meet with Wall St. people who helped caused the mess in the first place? Naturally, they want to be bailed out and influenced the decision. Why did Bush and Senate committee not meet with top economists who have no conflict of interest? Hello... hello..
Post new comment